| Connolly Posts First Complex Reviews By RACs |
| Written by Team eduTrax |
| Friday, 04 December 2009 03:52 |
|
eduTrax News Service - December 3, 2009. Connolly Healthcare posted the first Coding & DRG Validation issues approved by CMS for RAC audits, today. Twenty-five new issues were posted to their website, shortly after Noon ET. These issues are the first to be posted for Complex review, where a human must read medical records to determine the validity of the claim and reimbursement. All previously approved RAC audit issues have only been approved by CMS for Automated review, which only requires data analysis by computer. The MS-DRGs selected are not surprising, considering the findings of the RAC Demonstration project, and the potential dollar amounts that might be recouped by CMS and commissioned to the RAC. The complete listing can be found by selecting Connolly Healthcare from this page on www.myedutrax.com. The following 25 items were ADDED, for all States in Region C:
All of the above include this caveat: (At this time, Medical Necessity excluded from review). All the above include the same description and additional notes, as follows: Description: DRG Validation requires that diagnostic and procedural information and the discharge status of the beneficiary, as coded and reported by the hospital on its claim, matches both the attending physician description and the information contained in the beneficiary's medical record. Reviewers will validate for MS DRG {XXX}, principal diagnosis, secondary diagnosis, and procedures affecting or potentially affecting the DRG. Provider Type Affected: Inpatient Hospital Date of Service: 10/01/2007 - Open States Affected: Alabama, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas Additional Information: Additional information can be found on the following manuals/publications: ICD-9-CM for Hospitals Vol. 1, 2 & 3, Coding Guidelines, Section II, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H (2007 - 2009) ICD-9-CM Addendums and Coding Clinics (2007 - 2009) PIM Ch. 6.5.3, Section A-C DRG Validation Review It may be considered likely that the other RACs will shortly follow suit by posting similar or identical issues, in the next few weeks, which has been the history of these pages since they were first created. |
| Last Updated on Friday, 04 December 2009 04:14 |